Bug 107680 - RFE: Re-introduce X configuration and individual package selection on installation
RFE: Re-introduce X configuration and individual package selection on instal...
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: anaconda (Show other bugs)
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Michael Fulbright
Mike McLean
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2003-10-21 19:18 EDT by d_rosky
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2003-10-21 19:25:21 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description d_rosky 2003-10-21 19:18:57 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703

Description of problem:
As an enhancement request, please re-introduce the install-time X configuration
dialog and individual package selection dialog during installation.

Previous versions of RH allowed some limited configuration of X during the
install.  Most importantly, it allowed the selection of either run level 3 or
run level 5 as the default (by selecting "graphical or non-graphical login").  I
have always installed new versions with a run-level of 3 in case there was a
problem with the anaconda-configured X configuration (which there sometimes
were).  In fact, with Fedora test3, I was indeed left with a bad X configuration
which caused my system to hang when first booted.  Removing this option seems
like a step backward unless Red Hat can guarantee that all X configurations will
work properly as generated by anaconda (which hardly seems possible given the
number of hardware variations out there).

Also, please re-introduce the individual package selection option during
install.  There are many packages that are inaccessable from the normal package
selection screens or from the post-install "add and remove packages" utility. 
Yes, they can be added manually later, but it was easier with earlier versions
of RH, and thus represents a step backward, especially for experienced users.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install Fedora test3, individual package selection and X configurations
dialogs are missing.

Actual Results:  I was not able to select run-level 3 ("non-graphical login")
during installation.  I was left with a non-functioning X configuration which
required extra steps to fix compared to if I had started from run-level 3.

Also, installer did not present the individual package selection option.

Expected Results:  I expected to be able to select non-graphical login (runlevel
3) as the default during the installation.

I expected to be able to individually select several lesser-used packages
instead of having to manually install them from CD later.

Additional info:

As mentioned previously, these changes to the installation seem to be step
backward for experienced users.  They may not seem like a big deal, but in both
cases, they resulted in extra work and steps required to fix problems and get
needed packages installed.
Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2003-10-21 19:25:21 EDT
The X configuration used for post-install should be as close as humanly possible
to what we use during installation (we're not quite there, but that's the
ideal).  So if it works for the install, it should work on the post-install
system.  Adding configuration back fixes the wrong problem -- the problem is
that the X configuration wasn't right, not that you couldn't choose run level 3.

And individual package selection is bug 97176

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.