Bug 1083494 - (rejected for 6.3, debating for 6.4) Apache CXF partial build breaks layered platforms.
Summary: (rejected for 6.3, debating for 6.4) Apache CXF partial build breaks layered ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: Build
Version: 6.3.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: Pending
: EAP 6.4.0,EAP 6.3.2
Assignee: Carlo de Wolf
QA Contact: Petr Kremensky
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1132880 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 1104429
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-04-02 10:51 UTC by Nick Cross
Modified: 2019-08-19 12:42 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1125119 0 unspecified CLOSED (6.4.0) CXF partial build, org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-http-jetty:jar:2.7.11.redhat-3 is missing 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Bugzilla 1127174 0 unspecified CLOSED [DV] (6.4.0) CXF partial build, artifact org.apache.cxf:cxf-bundle:jar:2.7.10.redhat-1 is missing 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Bugzilla 1132880 0 unspecified CLOSED Improve apache-cxf build to include all modules needed by layered products 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1125119 1127174 1132880

Description Nick Cross 2014-04-02 10:51:29 UTC 
Some artifacts have not been built for Apache CXF e.g. cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs. This breaks layered platforms.
Comment 1 Kabir Khan 2014-04-02 18:11:49 UTC 
Nick, please make the title a bit more descriptive :-)
Comment 2 Paul Gier 2014-04-10 20:34:45 UTC 
Which version of Apache CXF are you referring to?
Comment 3 Nick Cross 2014-04-12 07:39:06 UTC 
I checked the CXF in EAP 6.2 ( 2.7.7.redhat-1 I think ) but it looks similar in jb-eap-6-rhel-6-build ( is it 2.7.10.redhat-1 ? )
Comment 4 Yong Yang 2014-04-23 14:45:07 UTC 
Currently, some not shipped artifacts are commented out, but they may be needed by layered products.

Will review the poms and try to recover the commented modules.
Comment 5 Yong Yang 2014-04-25 02:02:01 UTC 
I have enabled cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs in 2.7.11.redhat-1(https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/buildinfo?buildID=353621).

I don't have time to enable other modules in this build, will enable them in later build.
Comment 6 Yong Yang 2014-04-25 02:06:28 UTC 
Do we have a list for those missing artifacts/modules needed by layered products? so I can enable those ones first in the later build.
Comment 7 Nick Cross 2014-04-28 12:04:07 UTC 
We have not yet built the current version of the community projects but previously we needed cxf-rt-transports-http-jetty and cxf-bundle-jaxrs
Comment 8 Rostislav Svoboda 2014-05-14 08:53:50 UTC 
EAP is using RESTEasy for JAX RS, layered products should be synchronized here if possible. 

We don't want to break EAP. If you can ensure that these changes won't break EAP stuff I can reconsider qa_ack status.
Comment 9 Yong Yang 2014-05-19 06:44:32 UTC 
(In reply to Nick Cross from comment #7)
> We have not yet built the current version of the community projects but
> previously we needed cxf-rt-transports-http-jetty and cxf-bundle-jaxrs

I think cxf-rt-transports-http-jetty is the one we do not want to ship obviously, and cxf-bundle-jaxrs dependents on cxf-rt-transports-http-jetty. This is why they're excluded from our building.
Comment 11 Carlo de Wolf 2014-05-20 13:45:10 UTC 
EAP should not and will not distribute components it does not use directly. This is a LP concern.

That said, I do consider it a PROD task to provide the proper package to each product. This can be a base package with multiple siblings for each product or a package per product.
Comment 12 Vaclav Tunka 2014-05-20 13:46:51 UTC 
I agree with Carlo.
Comment 13 Julian Coleman 2014-08-06 10:19:13 UTC 
Proposing this for 6.3.1.
Comment 15 Yong Yang 2014-08-22 10:50:02 UTC 
org.apache.cxf-cxf-2.7.11.redhat_9-1(https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/buildinfo?buildID=379300) has all modules now.
Comment 17 Carlo de Wolf 2014-09-23 06:23:59 UTC 
*** Bug 1132880 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 22 Rostislav Svoboda 2014-12-02 11:13:59 UTC 
No unexpected problems spotted in EAP 6.3.2  ... so marking as resolved.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.