As per IRC conversation in #sbr-virt, it would be more useful to describe required vdsm and rhev-h versions in addition to the information provided here: https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization/3.4-Beta/html-single/Installation_Guide/index.html#Host_Compatibility_Matrix Please needinfo Bryan Yount when the content is updated to see if there's anything else that can be added.
Also need to update the table to include 3.5.
Hi Scott, Could you provide me with a full list of host compatibility matrix (including required vdsm and rhev-h versions)? Arthur mentioned someone from your team may have the answers. Please let me know who I should contact. Many thanks, Julie
*** Bug 1154371 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 1067195 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Pavel, could you please help provide this list?
Assigning back to Andrew to follow up.
Re-assigning to Tahlia for review. Tahlia - on discussion with Yaniv, we determined that what needs to happen to close this bug is to simply add a note to the topic in question stating that the latest version of VDSM provides backwards compatibility with all previous versions of RHEV.
Assigning Julie as the QA contact.
Changes for this bug are now published at https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-enterprise-virtualization/
Hi Talia, Seems like the link brings to the main virtualization docs page. Can you please provide a link to the specific document? Thank you!
Sure Marina. Here it is: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization/3.6-Beta/html/Installation_Guide/Host_Compatibility_Matrix.html