Hide Forgot
Description of problem: Since October 23, 2003 bind 9.2.3 is released, contains various useful fixes...see the CHANGES file for more information. I know, there are a lof fixes by Red Hat...but I can't believe, that all problems from bind 9.2.3 are solved by the Red Hat patches... Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): bind-9.2.3-P3-9 Additional info: Rebuilding without re-enable of the existing patches seems to work. May there are to add new patches.
I have made the bind-9.2.3-1 version of the RPM. It should be available in rawhide soon. It will be in FC2
I still can't use the rebuilded RPM (rebuild was successfull), but look, please: # rpm -Uvh bind-9.2.3-1.i386.rpm bind-devel-9.2.3-1.i386.rpm bind-utils-9.2.3-1.i386.rpm Error: Failed dependencies: libdns.so.10 is needed by bind-9.2.3-1 libisc.so.4 is needed by bind-9.2.3-1 libisc.so.4 is needed by bind-utils-9.2.3-1 # # less bind-utils-9.2.3-1.i386.rpm [...] lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Nov 12 09:15 /usr/lib/libdns.so.11 -> libdns.so.11.0.2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2606123 Nov 12 09:15 /usr/lib/libdns.so.11.0.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Nov 12 09:15 /usr/lib/libisc.so.7 -> libisc.so.7.0.1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 771249 Nov 12 09:15 /usr/lib/libisc.so.7.0.1 [...] I can't see the problem...why is there eg. a dependencie from bind-utils-9.2.3-1 to libisc.so.4 while libisc.so.7 is provided? Any idea what maybe is wrong would be very helpful... ;-)
Okay, I think, I know the problem: If I remove %clean from the spec file, rebuild a binary rpm, go to the build directory, do a make (and make install) and after that rebuild the rpm again, all works fine. But that solution is in my opinion still wrong and very ugly! Looking at the code there are about 15 paths the start with / for the includes. Please fix those problems through patches. Only then there will be a correct binary bind RPM.
I have made the bind-9.2.3-2 version of the RPM. It should be available in rawhide soon. It will be in FC2 Hopefully this one will work. Dan
Yepp, now it works fine :-) Thank you.