Bug 1106954 - RFE: Randomize hardware addresses when scanning for networks
Summary: RFE: Randomize hardware addresses when scanning for networks
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kernel Maintainer List
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-06-09 18:44 UTC by Miloslav Trmač
Modified: 2017-05-02 14:01 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-05-02 14:01:23 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Miloslav Trmač 2014-06-09 18:44:15 UTC
"In iOS8, Wi-Fi scanning behavior has changed to use random, locally administrated MAC addresses

Probe requests (management frame sub-type 0x4)
Probe responses (management frame sub-type 0x5)"
(e.g. http://arstechnica.com/apple/2014/06/ios8-to-stymie-trackers-and-marketers-with-mac-address-randomization/ )

This sounds like an interesting privacy enhancement and worth adding.  (The currently cited case of shops monitoring all visitors is not as applicable to  laptops/desktops as to phones, but the same kind of monitoring can be done for global tracking, e.g. from workplace to mall or airport to airport, or for targeting a specific individual.)

(Filing against NetworkManager as the top-level component because I don’t know the underlying architecture well enough, feel free to reassign.)

Comment 1 Dan Williams 2014-06-09 19:03:11 UTC
Yeah, I've seen the posts on the wpa_supplicant lists about this, and it's much more a driver/supplicant thing than NM at this point.  Upstream wpa_supplicant has indicated that they would like to default to this behavior once it has kernel support.  So I'll move the bug over to the kernel for that.

http://lists.shmoo.com/pipermail/hostap/2014-June/030405.html

Comment 2 Josh Boyer 2014-06-09 19:19:31 UTC
Are you using this as a tracking bug?  This really needs to happen upstream.

Comment 3 John W. Linville 2014-06-09 19:27:57 UTC
At first glance, this seems interesting...I'll Cc Johannes to see what he thinks -- he probably already has an answer in mind... :-)

Comment 4 Johannes Berg 2014-06-10 10:32:11 UTC
As Dan said, there was a discussion on the hostap list, which was probably not the appropriate venue but IMHO neither is RH's bugzilla, so I'll not track it here.

In general, I see no big issues with this, but programming the hardware for it might be tricky and will likely need driver support.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.