Bug 1107218 - rubygem-rgen: FTBFS in rawhide
Summary: rubygem-rgen: FTBFS in rawhide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: rubygem-rgen
Version: 21
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Vít Ondruch
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1239955 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 1140541
Blocks: F21FTBFS F23FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-06-09 20:35 UTC by Dennis Gilmore
Modified: 2015-12-02 15:34 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rubygem-rgen-0.7.0-1.fc23
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-07-14 13:14:22 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
build.log (23.51 KB, text/plain)
2014-06-09 20:35 UTC, Dennis Gilmore
no flags Details
root.log (77.10 KB, text/plain)
2014-06-09 20:35 UTC, Dennis Gilmore
no flags Details
state.log (1.08 KB, text/plain)
2014-06-09 20:35 UTC, Dennis Gilmore
no flags Details

Description Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 20:35:45 UTC
Your package rubygem-rgen failed to build from source in current rawhide.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7003739

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild

Comment 1 Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 20:35:50 UTC
Created attachment 906384 [details]
build.log

Comment 2 Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 20:35:52 UTC
Created attachment 906385 [details]
root.log

Comment 3 Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 20:35:54 UTC
Created attachment 906386 [details]
state.log

Comment 4 Jaroslav Reznik 2015-03-03 15:59:51 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle.
Changing version to '22'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22

Comment 5 Orion Poplawski 2015-04-10 17:09:12 UTC
This is supposedly fixed in rdoc 4.2.0

Comment 6 Vít Ondruch 2015-04-10 17:11:56 UTC
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #5)
> This is supposedly fixed in rdoc 4.2.0

So is it or not, since RDoc 4.2.0 is already in F22:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=623091

Comment 7 Orion Poplawski 2015-04-10 17:15:25 UTC
Yeah, the build is getting farther (though still failing).  So, does the rubygem-rdoc package need to be retired in F22+?  Would still be nice to have an updated rdoc in F21 as rgen currently doesn't build there.

Comment 8 Vít Ondruch 2015-04-10 17:19:28 UTC
It is bit unusual to have two copies of rubygem-rdoc, but I see no reason to retire the independent version. We sometimes update the independent package to be at newer version then the on shipped with Ruby. That would be PITA otherwise.

Comment 9 Vít Ondruch 2015-07-14 13:00:47 UTC
*** Bug 1239955 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.