Bug 110904 - libgcj depends on info package, but it is not listed as dependency
Summary: libgcj depends on info package, but it is not listed as dependency
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gcc (Show other bugs)
(Show other bugs)
Version: 1
Hardware: i386 Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jakub Jelinek
QA Contact:
: 117394 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2003-11-25 14:19 UTC by Rik Faith
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: 3.3.2-3
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2003-12-04 12:34:15 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2004:142 normal SHIPPED_LIVE GCC bugfix update 2004-05-11 04:00:00 UTC

Description Rik Faith 2003-11-25 14:19:05 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5)
Gecko/20031007 Firebird/0.7

Description of problem:
I'm installing a subset of Fedora Core packages for a chroot
environment.  I rely on RPM to check all the required dependencies.  I
see the following error:

########################################### [ 36%]
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73696: line 3: /sbin/install-info: No such file or
error: %post(libgcj-3.3.2-2) scriptlet failed, exit status 127

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Select a subset of RPMs, including libgcj, for installation.
2.Make the subset closed with respect to RPM dependencies.
3.Install all of the RPMs simultaneously.

Actual Results:  The post in libgcj fails to run because the
dependency on the info package isn't known to RPM.

Expected Results:  Successful %post.

Additional info:

Should there be a libgcj "component" for Fedora Core -- I found one
for RHL, but files this report under gcc because there wasn't one for

Comment 1 Miloslav Trmac 2003-11-25 15:42:39 UTC

Comment 2 Jakub Jelinek 2003-12-04 12:34:15 UTC
Should be fixed in gcc-3.3.2-3.

Comment 3 Jakub Jelinek 2004-03-03 15:56:29 UTC
*** Bug 117394 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 John Flanagan 2004-05-12 03:40:23 UTC
An errata has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. 
This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen 
this bug report if the solution does not work for you.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.