Staypuft-installer should be branded as osp-installer for downstream distribution.
Arthur, I can change the script that people use from staypuft-installer to osp-installer (simple change). Do we want to change answer-files? Do we want to change RPM names? Or are those acceptable as they are?
Ideally all RPMs and commands that are part of the main install flow should have downstream name rhel-osp-installer, where Staypuft is upstream name. so we do want to change the RPM name, and installer command. How much work would it require to change(and maintain) a downstream name for the answer-file ? if that's insignificant, than ideally we would want to change the answer file name as well.
Verified with: rhel-osp-installer-0.0.25-5.el6ost.noarch RPM name : rhel-osp-installer-0.0.25-5.el6ost.noarch Installer name: rhel-osp-installer Answer files: /etc/foreman/rhel-osp-installer.answers.yaml /etc/foreman/rhel-osp-installer.yaml
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1003.html