Bug 111782 - Inquiry information for SCSI device with LUN>0 not correctly parsed or represented
Summary: Inquiry information for SCSI device with LUN>0 not correctly parsed or repres...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: kernel
Version: 9
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Arjan van de Ven
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2003-12-10 01:45 UTC by David Tonhofer
Modified: 2007-04-18 17:00 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-09-30 15:41:44 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description David Tonhofer 2003-12-10 01:45:30 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5)
Gecko/20031007

Description of problem:
The description of a high-LUN SCSI device in 
/proc/scsi/scsi is mangled.

I have an autoloader on the SCSI bus (see below for more info).

Then:

$ mt -f /dev/st0 status

  SCSI 2 tape drive:
  File number=0, block number=0, partition=0.
  Tape block size 0 bytes. Density code 0x40 (DLT1 40 GB, or Ultrium).
  Soft error count since last status=0
  General status bits on (41010000):
    BOT ONLINE IM_REP_EN

$ mtx -f /dev/sg0 inquiry

  Product Type: Tape Drive
  Vendor ID: 'HP      '
  Product ID: 'C9264CB-VS80    '
  Revision: '5032'
  Attached Changer: No

But:


$ cat /proc/scsi/scsi

Attached devices:
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 06 Lun: 01
  Vendor: 000    3 Model:   8HP      C9264 Rev: CB-V
  Type:   Direct-Access                    ANSI SCSI revision: 01
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 06 Lun: 00
  Vendor: HP       Model: C9264CB-VS80     Rev: 5032
  Type:   Sequential-Access                ANSI SCSI revision: 02


Note the mangled representation of the device on LUN 1. It seems
shifted to the right or something.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Didn't try

Steps to Reproduce:
I have not really tried to reproduce it with a reboot.
However, repeatedly scanning the SCSI bus yields the above. 
Will check what happens after the next reboot.

    

Additional info:

a) I'm not a SCSI guru
b) The kernel is a monolithic recompiled kernel (i.e no module
   support) based on 2.4.20-20.9 with multiple LUN and SCSI tape
   support enabled. 
c) SCSI controller is an Adaptec 29160 SCSI card. 
d) The Autoloader is a HP DLT-VS80 C9264CB

And now for the special "Toon hardware setup". It should not have
an impact on the above. And it seems not to work, too (should it?):

The SCSI bus contains a second 29160 controller commandeered by a
RedHat 7.3 stock kernel. I thought that the tape drive could be
accessed from that second machine, too, like this:

    [Machine RH9.0]--------+        +------------[Machine RH7.3]
                           |        |
                         [ Autoloader ]

But apparently not, the RH9.0 machine could not find the SCSI tape
device at all if the RH7.3 machine had the aic7xxx module loaded.
The bug report applies to the case where the aic7xxx module on the
RH7.3 machine was NOT loaded. (If anyone can give a hint about whether
this *could* work in principle, please feel free)

Comment 1 David Tonhofer 2003-12-10 16:14:38 UTC
I have had an unvoluntary reboot this night...great stuff (The
server was just sitting there, switched on, in catatonic mode. No
lines in the kernel log to indicate what was wrong. Duh!) So here is
what /proc/scsi/scsi looks like after reboot:

$ cat /proc/scsi/scsi

Attached devices:
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 06 Lun: 00
  Vendor: 8HP      Model:  C9264CB-VS80    Rev:  503
  Type:   Sequential-Access                ANSI SCSI revision: ffffffff

This is looking ok, but high-LUNs have not been scanned (ok I guess),
so I do this using a little script (rescan-scsi-bus.sh), and after
that:

$ cat /proc/scsi/scsi

Attached devices:
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 06 Lun: 00
  Vendor: 8HP      Model:  C9264CB-VS80    Rev:  503
  Type:   Sequential-Access                ANSI SCSI revision: ffffffff
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 06 Lun: 01
  Vendor: 8HP      Model:  C9264CB-VS80    Rev:  503
  Type:   Medium Changer                   ANSI SCSI revision: ffffffff

Hmmm...so this does not look so bad, even though it's NOT what was
indicated before reboot. But now:

$ mtx status
illegal Element Type Code 54 reported

$ mt -f /dev/st0
...never returns

Bad news in the kernel log:
(scsi0:A:6:0): data overrun detected in Data-in phase.  Tag == 0x2.
(scsi0:A:6:0): Have seen Data Phase.  Length = 56.  NumSGs = 1.
sg[0] - Addr 0x01bc28000 : Length 56

Ok, so there is definitely something wrong with the bus, I will
change the geometry and be back.









Comment 2 David Tonhofer 2003-12-12 10:39:50 UTC
Changed geometry. Tape autoloader is now exclusively attached to
the RedHat 9.0 machine. After a SCSI bus rescan:

$ cat /proc/scsi/scsi

Attached devices:
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 06 Lun: 00
  Vendor: HP       Model: C9264CB-VS80     Rev: 5032
  Type:   Sequential-Access                ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 06 Lun: 01
  Vendor: HP       Model: C9264CB-VS80     Rev: 5032
  Type:   Medium Changer                   ANSI SCSI revision: 02

...so this looks better and better, the ANSI SCSI revision now
actually makes sense. 

$ mtx status

  Storage Changer /dev/changer:1 Drives, 8 Slots ( 0 Import/Export )
Data Transfer Element 0:Full (Storage Element 4 Loaded)
      Storage Element 1:Full
      Storage Element 2:Full
      Storage Element 3:Full
      Storage Element 4:Empty
      Storage Element 5:Full
      Storage Element 6:Full
      Storage Element 7:Full
      Storage Element 8:Full

$ mt -f /dev/st0 status

SCSI 2 tape drive:
File number=-1, block number=-1, partition=0.
Tape block size 0 bytes. Density code 0x40 (DLT1 40 GB, or Ultrium).
Soft error count since last status=0
General status bits on (1010000):
 ONLINE IM_REP_EN

All right! So it looks like I shot myself in the foot by trying to
be too clever by half?




Comment 3 Bugzilla owner 2004-09-30 15:41:44 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this version of
the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug if the problem
persists.

The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some older releases, 
and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the problem in
the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.