Description of problem:
[root@brq-update ~]# rhevm-dwh-setup -g dwh_ansfile
Answer file generated at dwh_ansfile
[root@brq-update ~]# cat dwh_ansfile
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Steps to Reproduce:
Unable to automate dwh-setup.
Answerfile is generated containing the prompted values and can be used for automated setup of the dwh.
This was fixed in 3.4.
That's why this bug was filed agains 3.3. Without this an upgrade of reports from 3.3 to 3.4 cannot be tested.
(In reply to Petr Beňas from comment #2)
> That's why this bug was filed agains 3.3. Without this an upgrade of reports
> from 3.3 to 3.4 cannot be tested.
Can you add logs and exact description of the issue?
We can't help you without these.
In 3.3 do we create a answer file at end of setup. Can you help him with the options answers?
(In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #6)
> In 3.3 do we create a answer file at end of setup. Can you help him with the
> options answers?
in 3.3 we do not write it in the end with the input answers. see . Could not find anywhere official doc about this answer file, or even an example.  only has a comment "Editing /tmp/alex to the appropriate values, then"...
Something like this should work, based on reading the code - didn't try that:
You can leave keys with None or just drop them. 'REMOTE_DB_HOST' is ignored - the host is taken from engine.
If you still have problems please tell me - I'd be very happy to see automated testing for dwh and reports setup!