Bug 11507 - transfig needs to be updated
transfig needs to be updated
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: transfig (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Trond Eivind Glomsrxd
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2000-05-18 13:29 EDT by Jonathan Kamens
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2000-05-18 18:11:50 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
new spec file (2.45 KB, text/plain)
2000-05-18 13:29 EDT, Jonathan Kamens
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Jonathan Kamens 2000-05-18 13:29:24 EDT
Transfig needs to be updated to 3.2.3.  Also, in 3.2.3a you need to specify
extra include flags and libraries to get it to work properly with gdbm.
I'll attach a new spec file (you'll want to change "Release").
Comment 1 Jonathan Kamens 2000-05-18 13:29:59 EDT
Created attachment 251 [details]
new spec file
Comment 2 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2000-05-18 18:11:59 EDT
This was updated as an errata item some weeks ago -
Comment 3 Jonathan Kamens 2000-05-18 20:19:59 EDT
It would be easier to find things like this if the /pub/ls-lR.gz on
ftp.redhat.com had been updated more recently than April 19.  I *do* check for
things like this before I file bug reports, but when you don't keep the
information you're publishing up-to-date, it makes it more difficult to do that

And why isn't the updated transfig package in RawHide?
Comment 4 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2000-05-19 10:52:59 EDT
Rawhide hasn't been updated for some time - I think the reason is it's to much
of a work in progress (read: severely broken).

I'll report the lack of ls -lR, but it's not the best way to find out about
updates - the web site is.
Comment 5 Jonathan Kamens 2000-05-21 06:40:59 EDT
You claim that "the web site" is the best way to find out about errata.  Can you
explain, then, why neither
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/rh62-errata-security.html nor
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/rh62-errata-bugfixes.html mentions anything
about transfig, krb5 or mutt, for example?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.