Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 11640 - LFS (>2GB file support on Ext2) in kernel-2.2.14-6.1.1, but absent in kernel-2.2.14-12?
LFS (>2GB file support on Ext2) in kernel-2.2.14-6.1.1, but absent in kernel-...
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: kernel (Show other bugs)
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Michael K. Johnson
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2000-05-24 13:09 EDT by Bryan -TheBS- Smith
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2000-05-24 13:09:49 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Bryan -TheBS- Smith 2000-05-24 13:09:49 EDT
The kernel-2.2.14-6.1.1.i686.rpm (and associated RPMs) apparently has >2GB
support as I was able to create a 2.5GB tarball (from files over an NFS
link).  Unfortunately, when I upgraded to kernel-2.2.14-12.i686.rpm (and
associated RPMs), any tarballs created crash at the "magical" 2147xxxxxx
byte limit (2GB).

From the information below, I can only surmise one of two reasons for this:

   A.  The i686.rpm for 2.2.14-12 was compiled without
       it?  (I am booting the stock i686.rpm kernel)

   B.  The addition of the "2.2.14-lfs-fix.patch" in the
       newer 2.2.14-12 kernel breaks the >2GB file
       capability for Ext2 filesystems.

Regarding "B", this is an RPM query on the .src.rpms of the two releases of
2.2.14 (6.1.1 and 12):

        $ rpm -qpl kernel-2.2.14-6.1.1.src.rpm | grep lfs

        $ rpm -qpl kernel-2.2.14-12.src.rpm | grep lfs
NEW --> linux-2.2.14-lfs-fix.patch       <-- NEW

Again, note the "fix" applied in the newer kernel, which no longer seems to
work for me.

FYI, I assume the LFS patches applied are from the URL:

Thanx in advance ...

-- Bryan "TheBS" Smith
   Theseus Logic, Inc.

P.S.  I will do more testing and verify the results with a custom compiled
kernel.  I haven't done so since I just discovered this on a production
server.  Frankly, I was surprised that even 2.2.14-6.1.1 had this in the
first place.  I guess it was a nice surprise, but not one I should have
gotten used to?>>  ;->>>
Comment 1 Michael K. Johnson 2000-07-31 17:25:39 EDT
2.2.14-6.1.1 was an enterprise upgrade kernel.
The LFS patches to the 2.2.x kernel series are not as well
tested in all situations as in the 2.4.x kernel series, so we
do not turn them on by default.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.