Bug 1195335 - Data types of Human Tasks variables are not preserved when modeled in Embedded Subprocess
Summary: Data types of Human Tasks variables are not preserved when modeled in Embedde...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1247105
Alias: None
Product: JBoss BPMS Platform 6
Classification: Retired
Component: jBPM Designer
Version: 6.0.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Tihomir Surdilovic
QA Contact: Kirill Gaevskii
Petr Penicka
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-02-23 15:37 UTC by Anton Giertli
Modified: 2019-03-22 07:40 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-16 18:12:25 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1186739 0 medium CLOSED Designer does not save a data type (itemDefinition element) of Data Input and Output set 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1186739

Description Anton Giertli 2015-02-23 15:37:45 UTC
Description of problem:

If you place Human Task into the embedded sub process then data types of input/output variables of this human task will not survive refresh/re-open of the process
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bpm suite 6.0.3

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create following process: start-->EMBEDDED_SUBPROCESS{start->HT->end}-->end
2. create some process variable, some taks/input output variable, and some mapping
3. save the process / refresh the page / re-open - the data types are gone.

Actual results:
The data type of input/output variables of Human Tasks modeled in Embedded sub process won't survive re-open.

Expected results:
The data type of input/output variables of Human Tasks modeled in Embedded sub process will survive re-open.

Additional info:
Before
http://ctrlv.cz/shots/2015/02/23/ucRc.png
After
http://ctrlv.cz/shots/2015/02/23/69Ug.png

Comment 2 Sona Mala 2015-02-24 08:20:16 UTC
It is similar to bz 1186739.

Comment 3 Kirill Gaevskii 2015-11-16 15:46:11 UTC
It is seems fixed in 6.2.ER5

Comment 4 Jeremy Lindop 2015-11-16 17:33:08 UTC
Hi Kirill, I think this bug was duplicated by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247105, which has been fixed.

I also tested it in 6.2.0.ER5 and found that it's fixed.

Comment 5 Kirill Gaevskii 2015-11-16 18:12:25 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1247105 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.