Bug 1196512 - %optflags in freehdl.pc
Summary: %optflags in freehdl.pc
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: freehdl
Version: 22
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ralf Corsepius
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-02-26 06:46 UTC by Ralf Corsepius
Modified: 2023-09-14 02:55 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: freehdl-0.0.8-10.fc21
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-09 08:17:49 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ralf Corsepius 2015-02-26 06:46:36 UTC
Description of problem:

/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/freehdl.pc
contains %optflags in cxxflags and cflags.

Packages are not supposed to add %optflags to *.pc

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
freehdl-0.0.8-9.fc22

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Check the rpm's contents

Actual results:
...
cxxflags=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches  -m64 -mtune=generic
cflags=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches  -m64 -mtune=generic
...


Additional info:
I haven't checked other fedora releases, but I assume this issue to be present there, too.

Comment 1 Ralf Corsepius 2015-02-26 10:48:30 UTC
Taking

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2015-02-26 23:23:09 UTC
freehdl-0.0.8-10.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freehdl-0.0.8-10.fc22

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2015-02-26 23:24:17 UTC
freehdl-0.0.8-10.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freehdl-0.0.8-10.fc21

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2015-02-26 23:24:22 UTC
freehdl-0.0.8-10.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freehdl-0.0.8-10.fc20

Comment 5 Ralf Corsepius 2015-02-27 01:10:16 UTC
Chitlesh, are you still around and interested in Fedora packages?

According to 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=159
your last package build took place on 2013-02-16, which makes me think you may not have sufficient time left for Fedora or not be interested in Fedora anymore.

Please, take this message as an initial notice of an potentially upcoming AWOL process and respond to this message. 

Thanks for your cooperation.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2015-02-27 19:43:43 UTC
Package freehdl-0.0.8-10.fc22:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing freehdl-0.0.8-10.fc22'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2772/freehdl-0.0.8-10.fc22
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 7 lnie 2015-03-02 06:07:04 UTC
freehdl-0.0.8-10.fc21 works

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2015-03-09 08:17:49 UTC
freehdl-0.0.8-10.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2015-03-09 08:23:00 UTC
freehdl-0.0.8-10.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2015-03-09 08:26:42 UTC
freehdl-0.0.8-10.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 02:55:22 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.