Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1202314

Summary: anti-aliasing broken on GDM login screen after updating to RHEL-7.1
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Laszlo Ersek <lersek>
Component: gdmAssignee: Ray Strode [halfline] <rstrode>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 7.1CC: toracat, vbenes
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Regression
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-17 13:30:00 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Laszlo Ersek 2015-03-16 11:38:19 UTC
(I'm fairly sure I'm reporting this problem for the wrong component. Also, I'm setting prio/sev to low/low up-front. It's just that I think this should be reported *somewhere*. and it would be nice to get an analysis and/or fix.)

So the issue is, after upgrading my RHEL-7 laptop to 7.1 over the weekend, I noticed that the small text labels on the gdm login screen ("Not listed?", "Password", "Cancel" etc) look worse. I can't quite put my finger on the difference, but the characters look jagged. I think there's some regression with antialiasing.

Comment 2 Ray Strode [halfline] 2015-03-16 11:50:15 UTC
is it just the login screen? or does it happen after login too?

Comment 4 Laszlo Ersek 2015-03-16 11:53:43 UTC
(In reply to Ray Strode [halfline] from comment #2)
> is it just the login screen? or does it happen after login too?

Can't really tell. I've only seen it on the login screen, but on my physical laptop I don't use the gnome shell, so I can't compare. I can try to check it in the VM though.

Comment 6 Laszlo Ersek 2015-03-16 12:28:42 UTC
Okay, compared two virtual machines, 7.0 and 7.1, when logged in. The difference in rendering does *not* seem to affect that environment; ie. it looks to be specific to the login screen.

Comment 8 Laszlo Ersek 2015-03-16 12:39:00 UTC
Huh, I just clicked the "Show other bugs" link near the top, which led me to believe that bug 1174223 might be a duplicate.

Comment 10 Vladimir Benes 2015-03-17 13:30:00 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1174223 ***

Comment 11 Akemi Yagi 2015-03-26 07:42:56 UTC
bug 1174223 is private. Could someone update the status of this bug in this Discussion thread?

https://access.redhat.com/comment/900903