Bug 120445 - Assertion `proc_handle.pid == 0' failed
Summary: Assertion `proc_handle.pid == 0' failed
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CANTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gdb
Version: rawhide
Hardware: athlon
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Alexandre Oliva
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-04-08 20:16 UTC by Neal Becker
Modified: 2008-08-02 23:40 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-10-29 21:23:56 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Neal Becker 2004-04-08 20:16:08 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.2; Linux) (KHTML, like Gecko)

Description of problem:
(gdb) attach 11872
Attaching to program: /usr/bin/python, process 11872
Error while mapping shared library sections:
./STL.so: No such file or directory.
Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -150159232 (LWP 11872)]
Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
Reading symbols from /lib/libdl.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libdl.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/libutil.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libutil.so.1
Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libm.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libm.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libc.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/python2.3/lib-dynload/readline.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/python2.3/lib-dynload/readline.so
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libreadline.so.4...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libreadline.so.4
Reading symbols from /lib/libtermcap.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libtermcap.so.2
Error while reading shared library symbols:
./STL.so: No such file or directory.
Reading symbols from /usr/local/src/boost_1_31_0/stage/lib/libboost_python-gcc-1_31.so.1.31.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/local/src/boost_1_31_0/stage/lib/libboost_python-gcc-1_31.so.1.31.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5
Reading symbols from /lib/libgcc_s.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
0x008657a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
(gdb) cd ~/shannon/Test2
Working directory /home/nbecker/shannon/Test2.
(gdb) sym STL.so
Reading symbols from STL.so...done.
/usr/src/build/358354-i386/BUILD/gdb+dejagnu-20031117/gdb/thread-db.c:643: internal-error: thread_db_new_objfile: Assertion `proc_handle.pid == 0' failed.
A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
further debugging may prove unreliable.
Quit this debugging session? (y or n) y

/usr/src/build/358354-i386/BUILD/gdb+dejagnu-20031117/gdb/thread-db.c:643: internal-error: thread_db_new_objfile: Assertion `proc_handle.pid == 0' failed.
A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
further debugging may prove unreliable.
Create a core file of GDB? (y or n) n

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.0post-1.20031117.8rh)

How reproducible:
Didn't try

Steps to Reproduce:
1.gdb
2.
3.
    

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jan Kratochvil 2006-09-26 15:59:38 UTC
Did not try to reproduce it as the failed assertion even is no longer present in
the current gdb-6.5.  Threads support has also been improved a lot since that time.
Sorry for not handling this bug earlier.
Please CLOSE the bug if you have no longer problems with this issue.


Comment 2 John Thacker 2006-10-29 21:23:56 UTC
Closing per lack of response to previous request for information.  Note that FC3
and FC4 are only supported by Fedora Legacy for security fixes.  If this is a
security issue, please assign to Fedora Legacy.  Otherwise, please retest with
FC5 or FC6, and if it still occurs, please reopen and assign to the correct
version.  Many changes have occurred since this bug was first filed and it may
be fixed in a more recent version.  We apologize for not fixing this bug
earlier.  Thanks!


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.