From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ja-JP; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031114 Description of problem: changing the resolution doesn't work for the printer driver which is included in ghostscript. and such drivers can changes the resolution against -r option. so the resolution which is configured on s-c-p should be given to gs too. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.configure the printer like NEC MultiWriter 2.print out something 3.change the resolution and print out again. Actual Results: no changes the resolution. Expected Results: should changes the resolution properly Additional info: to confirm this without the MultiWriter printer, you can see below what happens. $ gs -dBATCH -dQUIET -dNOPAUSE -sDEVICE=npdl -sOutputFile=foo.out /usr/share/printconf/tests/test-sjis.ps $ gs -r600 -dBATCH -dQUIET -dNOPAUSE -sDEVICE=npdl -sOutputFile=bar.out /usr/share/printconf/tests/test-sjis.ps $ ls -l *out -rw-rw-r-- 1 tagoh tagoh 193563 Apr 9 23:25 bar.out -rw-rw-r-- 1 tagoh tagoh 47364 Apr 9 23:25 foo.out and according to gdevnpdl.c, default resolution is 240.
Shouldn't the driver have its resolution set from the PostScript directive that gets put in its input stream?
not sure, but it seems not to works for all of the drivers. perhaps -r option may not works for all of the drivers as well? BTW gs doesn't have all of the drivers, do it?
Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again.
This bug has been in NEEDINFO for more than 30 days since feedback was first requested. As a result we are closing it. If you can reproduce this bug in the future against a maintained Fedora version please feel free to reopen it against that version. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp