Bug 120701 - strace misses message queue support
strace misses message queue support
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: strace (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Roland McGrath
Brian Brock
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2004-04-13 01:11 EDT by Ulrich Drepper
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-04-16 19:25:01 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch to add mq support for x86 (4.73 KB, patch)
2004-04-13 01:11 EDT, Ulrich Drepper
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Ulrich Drepper 2004-04-13 01:11:24 EDT
Description of problem:
The 2.6.6 kernel sports support for POSIX message queues.  strace
needs to catch up.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
strace-4.5.2-1.1

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.run code using POSIX message queues
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
SYS_xxx lines

Expected results:
syscall names

Additional info:
I'll attach a patch.
Comment 1 Ulrich Drepper 2004-04-13 01:11:59 EDT
Created attachment 99352 [details]
Patch to add mq support for x86
Comment 2 Roland McGrath 2004-04-13 22:45:43 EDT
Please add a note here when these system call numbers go into the
mainstream Linux kernel.
Comment 3 Ulrich Drepper 2004-04-16 04:14:01 EDT
The changes are in the upstream kernel.  I wouldn't have filed a bug
if this wasn't the case.
Comment 4 Roland McGrath 2004-04-16 17:43:28 EDT
I've merged the changes upstream and fixed some portability problems.
Comment 5 Jay Turner 2004-09-01 23:32:27 EDT
An errata has been issued which should help the problem 
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being 
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, 
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report 
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2004-338.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.