Bug 121944 - Authentication fails when LDAP server is not available
Summary: Authentication fails when LDAP server is not available
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 55193
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: authconfig (Show other bugs)
(Show other bugs)
Version: 1
Hardware: All Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tomas Mraz
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-04-29 09:18 UTC by Paulo Silva
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-10-15 07:34:27 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Paulo Silva 2004-04-29 09:18:58 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6)
Gecko/20040413 Galeon/1.3.14 (Debian package 1.3.14a-1)

Description of problem:
I'm using the authconfig tool to configure the system's authentication
through an OpenLDAP local server. I was wondering what happened when the
server is down and I noticed that all authentication fails, even those
in the passwd file. I think it should fall back to normal account if
available.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.3.8-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Use authconfig to enable LDAP authentication.
2. Stop the LDAP server.
3. Try to login with an normal account.
    

Actual Results:  Login fails.

Expected Results:  Login with normal accounts (from /etc/passwd)
should be enabled.

Additional info:

By altering the pam_unix account line in the
/etc/pam.d/system-auth file from:

   account required /lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so

to

  account sufficient /lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so

I was able to get it right.

Comment 1 Jindrich Novy 2004-09-14 12:23:26 UTC
*** Bug 121451 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Tomas Mraz 2004-10-15 07:31:46 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 55193 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.