Spec URL: http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/rubygem-molinillo.spec SRPM URL: http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/rubygem-molinillo-0.2.3-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: Molinillo is a generic dependency resolution implementation in Ruby. Fedora Account System Username: jstribny
I have pushed two feature branches ruby21 (for f21) and ruby22 (f22). At a glance, this solves this problem. In this branch, the ruby plugin is also a separate package, although still within the same srpm. A small step. I need help from ruby-knowledged people to review and test this branch (anyone, they are identical from s ruby perspective).
WTF?! Right comment in wrong bug. Please ignore.
Would you be interested in review swap with rubygem-aws-sdk-resources?: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249748 Review comments for rubygem-molinillo: 1) new version released in the meantime 2) /usr/bin/env dependency in -doc subpackage (just a hint, maybe it's OK) Possible solution is 'chmod -x' on spec/resolver_integration_specs/index_from_rubygems.rb . 3) ruby(release) and ruby are probably not needed? (just a hint, maybe it's OK or needed)
Sorry Františku, But I am not sure this package has independent future in Fedora, since I have asked for bundling exception for this package [1]. [1] https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/560
No problem. So even bundling is bundled in the bundler. :-)
There is no use for independent Molinillo package. We are bundling it in Bundler ATM and there is no way around it unfortunately :/