Bug 1231172 - RHEL 7.2 will support storage based fencing for pacemaker (sbd). Is this supported in streched cluster?
Summary: RHEL 7.2 will support storage based fencing for pacemaker (sbd). Is this supp...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: pacemaker
Version: 7.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Andrew Beekhof
QA Contact: cluster-qe@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-06-12 10:34 UTC by ktenzer
Modified: 2015-06-14 10:15 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-06-14 10:15:41 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description ktenzer 2015-06-12 10:34:37 UTC
Description of problem:
Is storage based fencing (alternative to SCSI Reservation) supported in RHEL 7.2 when running pacemaker as streched cluster?

We are planning a customer environment and need to know.

If not can SCSI Reservation be used in the case that host OS (RHEL) is running as a virtual machine?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2015-06-14 10:15:41 UTC
(In reply to ktenzer from comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> Is storage based fencing (alternative to SCSI Reservation) supported in RHEL
> 7.2 when running pacemaker as streched cluster?
> 
> We are planning a customer environment and need to know.
> 
> If not can SCSI Reservation be used in the case that host OS (RHEL) is
> running as a virtual machine?
> 

Not for 7.2. We do have non-storage based fencing based on hardware watchdog as alternative (sbd). Also queries of this kind don't require a bugzilla.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.