Bug 1232264 - [Docs] [Identity] Provide introductions to sections on projects
Summary: [Docs] [Identity] Provide introductions to sections on projects
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: documentation
Version: 7.0 (Kilo)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: z1
: 7.0 (Kilo)
Assignee: Suyog Sainkar
QA Contact: Martin Lopes
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1265075
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-06-16 11:43 UTC by Andrew Dahms
Modified: 2015-12-02 12:00 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-12-02 12:00:26 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Andrew Dahms 2015-06-16 11:43:21 UTC
General introductory text must be added to each of the following sections on projects in the Users and Identity Guide -

* Project Management
  - What is a project?
  - Can we standardize all mention of 'projects' to 'tenants'? Perhaps we 
    need to repeat the fact that projects are also called tenants here?

* Create a Project
  - Why would an administrator want to create a new project?

* Edit a Project
  - We have an 'edit' procedure for projects, but not for users or roles. 
    Also, we have a 'Note' box calling out how to enable a project, but 
    with users this task had its own topic. Can one approach or the other
    be adopted for each?

* Delete a Project
  - What happens when you delete a project?
  - Do we really need the 'Note' box here? This seems pretty clear.

* Update Project Quotas
  - So, we have project quotas in addition to user quotas. How do these 
    interact with one another, and which takes precedence over the other?

Comment 3 Andrew Dahms 2015-06-16 11:47:14 UTC
Assigning to Mikey for review.

Comment 4 Andrew Dahms 2015-06-16 12:04:17 UTC
Additional note - we talk about roles (and their relationship with projects) before we talk about projects themselves. Perhaps it would make sense to move the section on projects above the section on roles.

Comment 5 Andrew Dahms 2015-08-17 08:11:48 UTC
Re-assigning to the default assignee for re-triaging as the schedule allows.

Comment 6 Andrew Dahms 2015-08-21 01:50:12 UTC
Assigning to Suyog for review.

Suyog - what we need here is at least a few lines for each section that helps users understand why each procedure has been provided and any considerations they might need to make.

Comment 9 Andrew Dahms 2015-12-02 12:00:26 UTC
This content is now live on the Customer Portal.

Closing.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.