RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1253143 - error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
Summary: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kross-interpreters
Version: 7.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Than Ngo
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1048521 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-08-13 06:17 UTC by Tomas Pelka
Modified: 2015-09-01 11:09 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: kross-interpreters-4.10.5-6.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-08-27 13:48:44 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:1690 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE kross-interpreters bug fix update 2015-08-27 17:48:36 UTC

Description Tomas Pelka 2015-08-13 06:17:20 UTC
Description of problem:
Ignoring invalid regex ^%{_scl_prefix}/.*$|%{_root_sysconfdir}/rpm/macros.rh-mysql56-config$
Ignoring invalid regex ^%{_scl_prefix}/.*$|%{_root_sysconfdir}/rpm/macros.rh-mysql56-config$
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib64/kde4/kross/kross.jar
/usr/lib64/kde4/krossjava.so

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kross-interpreters-4.10.5-5.el7

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. build rpm from source
2.
3.

Actual results:
rpmbuild fail on mentioned error message

Expected results:
there should be no unpackaged files

Additional info:
I know it is minor issue, but we always guarantee (with a few exceptions) that src rpm can be build also by customer on standard env and not only in brew which is kind of non-standard build env.

Comment 1 Jan Grulich 2015-08-13 07:22:12 UTC
Isn't this a problem in SCL or whatever was used for your build? I don't see anything wrong in kross-interpreters spec file.

Comment 3 Than Ngo 2015-08-19 11:23:41 UTC
the problem is that somehow java is installed in the build enviroment by default (without any buildrequiremnt in the specfile, it's strange for me) and it's detected in cmakefile and so the kross java plugin was enable and built in this case.

It's a bug in the sepcfile. We have to make sure in the specfile that java plugin should not be built independent of java when kross_java is not set

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2015-08-27 13:48:44 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1690.html

Comment 13 Jan Grulich 2015-09-01 11:09:47 UTC
*** Bug 1048521 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.