Bug 125664 - java-1.4.1-ibm-1.4.1.2-1jpp_2rh says it obsoletes both IBMJava2-JRE and IBMJava2-SDK but only obsoletes the JRE package
Summary: java-1.4.1-ibm-1.4.1.2-1jpp_2rh says it obsoletes both IBMJava2-JRE and IBMJa...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
Classification: Red Hat
Component: IBMJava2-JRE
Version: 3.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Thomas Fitzsimmons
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-06-09 20:05 UTC by Paul Rhodes
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:07 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-09-22 15:35:07 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2004:608 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Updated java-1.4.2-ibm packages 2004-12-21 05:00:00 UTC

Description Paul Rhodes 2004-06-09 20:05:50 UTC
Description of problem:

java-1.4.1-ibm-1.4.1.2-1jpp_2rh says it obsoletes 
IBMJava2-JRE-1.4.1-8.i386.rpm, IBMJava2-JRE-1.4.1-11.i386.rpm,
IBMJava2-SDK-1.4.1-9.i386.rpm, and IBMJava2-SDK-1.4.1-11.i386.rpm, but
only obsoletes the JRE packages.  It does not install the javac binary
that the SDK packages install (that was just the first thing that
broke, so who knows what else it doesn't install.) 
java-1.4.1-ibm-devel-1.4.1.2-1jpp_2rh appears to be the actual package
that obsoletes the SDK packages.
  
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
 100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.run up2date and let it uninstall the IBMJava2 packages, and install
the java-1.4.1-ibm-1.4.1.2-1jpp_2rh.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:  Does not reinstall everything it uninstalls


Expected results:  Replace the obsoleted binaries


Additional info:

Comment 2 Suzanne Hillman 2004-06-14 14:33:08 UTC
The problem you are running into is that you need to install the
java-devel package as well as the java package, which apparently an
up2date does not take care of.

Comment 3 Paul Rhodes 2004-06-15 21:32:09 UTC
Exactly..... Hence my deduction that the java package does not
obsolete the SDK, but that the java-devel package does.  Am I
misunderstanding the meaning of "obsolete" in the context of packages?

Comment 4 Thomas Fitzsimmons 2004-09-20 15:18:40 UTC
You're right.  The SDK packages should be obsoleted by the java-devel
package only and not by the base package.  This will be fixed in the
next release.


Comment 5 Thomas Fitzsimmons 2004-09-22 15:35:07 UTC
Fixed in package CVS.


Comment 6 John Flanagan 2004-12-21 22:46:35 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2004-608.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.