Bug 1260792 - [RFE] packages selected for content view should include dependent packages regardless of filters
Summary: [RFE] packages selected for content view should include dependent packages re...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1152515
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Content Views
Version: 6.1.1
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
urgent
high
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: satellite6-bugs
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1316897
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-09-07 19:33 UTC by Fred van Zwieten
Modified: 2023-09-18 00:11 UTC (History)
23 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-05-09 15:22:48 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Pulp Redmine 2478 0 Normal NEW Support more conservative dependency solving 2016-12-08 02:00:57 UTC

Description Fred van Zwieten 2015-09-07 19:33:10 UTC
Description of problem:
Currently, packages selected for inclusion into a content view during publish do not include dependent packages which is a big annoyance because this dependency checking must now be done manually which is a lot of work, especially if it is a multilevel dependency.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

6.
Steps to Reproduce:
example:
1. create content view with rhel 7Server
2. create include filter on all base packages
3. create include filter on errata up to 1-apr-2015
4. create include filter on package redhat-access-insights
5. publish & promote contentview
6. subscribe content host to this content views repo's
7. try to install redhat-access-insights
8. look at dependency errors and try to resolve based on info
9. keep doning until all dependencies are resolved.

Actual results:
yum dependency errors

Expected results:
able to install packages with all dependencies resolved

Additional info:
If dependency cannot be resolved due to missing dependent packages in included repo's the publish task should fail with a clear explanation why it failed.

Comment 12 Bryan Kearney 2016-07-08 20:18:52 UTC
Per 6.3 planning, moving out non acked bugs to the backlog

Comment 20 pulp-infra@redhat.com 2016-12-08 02:00:58 UTC
The Pulp upstream bug status is at NEW. Updating the external tracker on this bug.

Comment 21 pulp-infra@redhat.com 2016-12-08 02:01:05 UTC
The Pulp upstream bug priority is at Normal. Updating the external tracker on this bug.

Comment 26 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-18 00:11:49 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.