From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510 Description of problem: 'Chapter 6. Using the Bootstrap Script' states 'Note that systems running Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 2.1 or versions of Red Hat Linux prior to 8.0 should use the script labeled "AS." Refer to the Appendix A Sample Bootstrap Script for an example script:' This should read 'Note that systems running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 or versions of Red Hat Linux prior to 8.0 should use the script labeled "AS." Refer to the Appendix A Sample Bootstrap Script for an example script:' I just had a customer calling as he was trying to use the newer bootstrap script on RHEL 2.1 ES. His logic was that ES 2.1 is not AS 2.1 and that the docs led him to believe that this meant he needed to run the newer bootstrap script Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. try to register existing systems via bootstrap 2. system is RHEL 2.1 ES 3. read docs Actual Results: wrong choice of bootstrap scrip Expected Results: clear statement in the docs Additional info:
Yeah, wow, good catch there Patrick. I should've caught this myself on the initial write-up. Although the script is labeled AS, and all new Sats. must run on AS, our clients can be any flavor. Dunno what I was thinking. Tell your customer sorry for me; I'll get this fixed in the next release. Aligning to the 350 doc tracking bug, setting the version to 350, and marking customer facing.
Moving blocker from the 350 hosted doc bug to the 350 sat doc bug, since that is when this documentation change will appear.
This change has been made.
Looks good on QA.