Bug 1267682 - dnf partial upgrade with wildcards causes "dnf upgrade" to fail
dnf partial upgrade with wildcards causes "dnf upgrade" to fail
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: dnf (Show other bugs)
23
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity unspecified
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: packaging-team-maint
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2015-09-30 12:25 EDT by Ronald L Humble
Modified: 2015-10-02 18:36 EDT (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-10-02 18:36:01 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Ronald L Humble 2015-09-30 12:25:47 EDT
Description of problem:
dnf partial upgrade with wildcards causes "dnf upgrade" to fail

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
dnf-1.1.2-2.fc23.noarch
How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.dnf upgrade v\* (available "v*" upgrades installed)
2.dnf upgrade 
   Last metadata expiration check performed 1:11:37 ago ...
Dependencies resolved.
Nothing to do.
3. dnf upgrade l\* (available upgrades beginning with "l" installed)

Actual results: :"dnf upgrade" reports "Nothing to do" in spite of upgrades being available.


Expected results:
"dnf upgrade v\*;dnf upgrade" should perform a complete upgrade of all available packages.
Additional info:
Fedora 22 upgrades act as have been accustomed to seeing. Exact letters used with wildcards not a factor. Note that the system tray icon reports multiple upgrades available prior to execution of these terminal commands. Choosing a "bad" letter is not a factor.
Comment 1 Michal Luscon 2015-10-02 18:36:01 EDT
Fixed in dnf-1.1.2-4.fc23.noarch.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.