Description of problem: The atomic-openshift-installer doesn't support HA master installation yet, but it provide a way to allow user to specify multiple master right now. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): atomic-openshift-utils-3.0.12-1.git.25.269bbc5.el7aos.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.[root@openshift-v3 ~]# atomic-openshift-installer install ***Host Configuration*** ... Enter hostname or IP address: []: 192.168.0.121 Will this host be an OpenShift Master? [y/N]: y Do you want to add additional hosts? [y/N]: y Enter hostname or IP address: []: 192.168.0.122 Will this host be an OpenShift Master? [y/N]: y Do you want to add additional hosts? [y/N]: y Enter hostname or IP address: []: 192.168.0.123 Will this host be an OpenShift Master? [y/N]: y Do you want to add additional hosts? [y/N]: N ... TASK: [openshift_master | fail ] ********************************************** failed: [192.168.0.121] => {"failed": true} msg: openshift_master_cluster_method must be set to either 'native' or 'pacemaker' for multi-master installations FATAL: all hosts have already failed -- aborting Actual results: The installer failed to set up a HA master environment. Expected results: The installer should give a reminder or warning that it's not supporting HA master installation. Or the installer should keep user from being able to specify multiple master host during the interactive guide. Additional info:
Verify this bug with atomic-openshift-utils-3.0.13-1.git.0.5e8c5c7.el7aos.noarch, the installer would not prompt the master selection once one master host has been input. [root@openshift-v3 ~]# atomic-openshift-installer install ... Enter hostname or IP address: []: 192.168.1.36 Will this host be an OpenShift Master? [y/N]: N Do you want to add additional hosts? [y/N]: y Enter hostname or IP address: []: 192.168.1.35 Will this host be an OpenShift Master? [y/N]: y Do you want to add additional hosts? [y/N]: y Enter hostname or IP address: []: 192.168.1.34 Do you want to add additional hosts? [y/N]: N
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015:2493