Bug 1288085 - glusterd related core observed while probing a node which is already in cluster.
Summary: glusterd related core observed while probing a node which is already in cluster.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: glusterd
Version: rhgs-3.1
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Gaurav Kumar Garg
QA Contact: storage-qa-internal@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard: glusterd
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-12-03 13:08 UTC by Shashank Raj
Modified: 2016-11-08 03:52 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-11 18:04:29 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Shashank Raj 2015-12-03 13:08:14 UTC
Description of problem:

glusterd related core observed while probing a node which is already in cluster.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

glusterfs-3.7.5-8

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.While running automated cases related to snapshots observed core related to glusterd.
2.This happened while probing a node which is already a part of the cluster.

Actual results:

glusterd related core observed

Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Shashank Raj 2015-12-03 13:19:53 UTC
sos reports are at http://rhsqe-repo.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com/sosreports/1288085

Comment 3 Gaurav Kumar Garg 2015-12-07 08:52:02 UTC
Hi shashank,

core file is missing from the sos report. could you check it again and attach core file somewhere so can we can analyse this issue. we need core file to analyse this issue.

Comment 4 Shashank Raj 2015-12-07 09:25:34 UTC
core file is placed at http://rhsqe-repo.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com/sosreports/1288085/core/core.4750

Comment 5 Gaurav Kumar Garg 2015-12-09 07:09:43 UTC
Hi Shashank,

Its very rare to reproduce this issue. glusterd crashed because at the time of sending response to CLI some application have corrupted dictionary data. by looking into backtrace using gdb we didn't found out much information regarding this which application have corrupted dictionary and freed its one of the member which is trying to free again.

Comment 6 Atin Mukherjee 2015-12-11 04:15:30 UTC
Lowering both priority and severity as the crash is not reproducible.

Comment 7 Atin Mukherjee 2016-02-11 18:04:29 UTC
Shashank,

Since this bug is not reproducible and we haven't heard any such core in recent times closing this bug. Feel free to reopen if you hit it again.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.