Bug 1291423 - syslinux spec file uses non-existent %{x86_64} rpm macro
Summary: syslinux spec file uses non-existent %{x86_64} rpm macro
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1308298
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: syslinux
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Peter Jones
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-12-14 20:44 UTC by giulioo
Modified: 2016-02-16 18:55 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-16 18:55:13 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Change %{x86_64} into x86_64 (891 bytes, patch)
2015-12-14 20:44 UTC, giulioo
no flags Details | Diff

Description giulioo 2015-12-14 20:44:17 UTC
Created attachment 1105681 [details]
Change %{x86_64} into x86_64

Description of problem:
RPM spec file uses 4 times the test
   %ifarch %{x86_64}
 
AFAIK, there's no such %{x86_64} rpm macro, so that the syslinux-efi64 rpm never
 gets built.
 
 
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
syslinux-6.03-6.fc24.src.rpm
 
How reproducible:
Always
 
Steps to Reproduce:
On an x86_64 system:
rpmbuild --rebuild syslinux-6.03-6.fc24.src.rpm

Actual results:
No syslinux-efi64 rpm built
 
For example, look into
http://fedora.mirrors.ovh.net/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/s/
and syslinux-efi64 is not there
 
Expected results:
syslinux-efi64 rpm built


Attaching patch

Comment 1 poma 2015-12-19 10:10:35 UTC
+1
Syslinux EFI x64
http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-December/024670.html

Comment 2 poma 2016-02-14 04:42:01 UTC
See Also:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308298

Comment 3 poma 2016-02-16 15:39:11 UTC
giulioo, would you mind close this one as a duplicate of bug 1308298,
so they are no longer three, but one cumulative effort.

Comment 4 giulioo 2016-02-16 18:55:13 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1308298 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.