Bug 1297412 - [abrt] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
Summary: [abrt] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: xorg-x11-drv-intel
Version: 23
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Adam Jackson
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf...
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:870adee8acc99781424d79570f1...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-01-11 12:56 UTC by Laszlo Pal
Modified: 2016-12-20 17:46 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-20 17:46:57 UTC
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: dmesg (93.64 KB, text/plain)
2016-01-11 12:56 UTC, Laszlo Pal
no flags Details

Description Laszlo Pal 2016-01-11 12:56:23 UTC
Description of problem:
When I played webm video in latest google-chrome

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.6.3
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
4.2.6-300.fc23.x86_64+debug #1 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
systemd-logind/1217 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa01bafa9>] i915_gem_unmap_dma_buf+0x39/0x100 [i915]

but task is already holding lock:
 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00389de>] drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked+0x13e/0x170 [drm]

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
  lock(&dev->struct_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

2 locks held by systemd-logind/1217:
 #0:  (drm_global_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0037bfa>] drm_release+0x3a/0x4d0 [drm]
 #1:  (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00389de>] drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked+0x13e/0x170 [drm]

stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 1217 Comm: systemd-logind Not tainted 4.2.6-300.fc23.x86_64+debug #1
Hardware name: LENOVO 2349PVG/2349PVG, BIOS G1ETA8WW (2.68 ) 03/06/2015
 0000000000000000 00000000fd99cb93 ffff88041de43a28 ffffffff81869b26
 0000000000000000 ffffffff82af9b90 ffff88041de43b08 ffffffff8110a188
 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff88041de43a58 ffffffff81128500
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff81869b26>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
 [<ffffffff8110a188>] __lock_acquire+0x1cd8/0x1d00
 [<ffffffff81128500>] ? wait_rcu_gp+0x70/0xb0
 [<ffffffff81026d68>] ? native_sched_clock+0x28/0x90
 [<ffffffff8110ab37>] lock_acquire+0xc7/0x270
 [<ffffffffa01bafa9>] ? i915_gem_unmap_dma_buf+0x39/0x100 [i915]
 [<ffffffff8186f73f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x7f/0x3e0
 [<ffffffffa01bafa9>] ? i915_gem_unmap_dma_buf+0x39/0x100 [i915]
 [<ffffffff81026d68>] ? native_sched_clock+0x28/0x90
 [<ffffffffa01bafa9>] ? i915_gem_unmap_dma_buf+0x39/0x100 [i915]
 [<ffffffff810e7e3c>] ? local_clock+0x1c/0x20
 [<ffffffffa01bafa9>] i915_gem_unmap_dma_buf+0x39/0x100 [i915]
 [<ffffffff815add75>] dma_buf_unmap_attachment+0x55/0x80
 [<ffffffffa0052862>] drm_prime_gem_destroy+0x22/0x40 [drm]
 [<ffffffffa0389381>] nouveau_gem_object_del+0x81/0xf0 [nouveau]
 [<ffffffffa0038247>] drm_gem_object_free+0x27/0x30 [drm]
 [<ffffffffa00389f8>] drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked+0x158/0x170 [drm]
 [<ffffffffa0038b9a>] drm_gem_object_release_handle+0x5a/0x80 [drm]
 [<ffffffff814217c8>] idr_for_each+0xc8/0x130
 [<ffffffffa0038b40>] ? drm_gem_dumb_destroy+0x20/0x20 [drm]
 [<ffffffffa0039284>] drm_gem_release+0x24/0x40 [drm]
 [<ffffffffa0037f9e>] drm_release+0x3de/0x4d0 [drm]
 [<ffffffff81272405>] __fput+0xf5/0x200
 [<ffffffff8127255e>] ____fput+0xe/0x10
 [<ffffffff810d19cd>] task_work_run+0x8d/0xc0
 [<ffffffff8101caad>] do_notify_resume+0x8d/0x90
 [<ffffffff818737e6>] int_signal+0x12/0x17

Comment 1 Laszlo Pal 2016-01-11 12:56:32 UTC
Created attachment 1113609 [details]
File: dmesg

Comment 2 Fedora End Of Life 2016-11-24 14:50:43 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '23'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 3 Fedora End Of Life 2016-12-20 17:46:57 UTC
Fedora 23 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-12-20. Fedora 23 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.