Bug 1298830 - CTDB: Need to add warning that ctdb2.5 is deprecated and updates for ctdb is provided via samba channel/repos
Summary: CTDB: Need to add warning that ctdb2.5 is deprecated and updates for ctdb is ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: doc-Installation_Guide
Version: rhgs-3.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: RHGS 3.1.2
Assignee: Bhavana
QA Contact: surabhi
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1293253
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-01-15 08:28 UTC by surabhi
Modified: 2017-11-17 05:21 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-11-17 05:17:38 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description surabhi 2016-01-15 08:28:18 UTC
Document URL: 
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Storage/3.1/html/Installation_Guide/chap-Deploying_Samba_on_Red_Hat_Storage.html

Section Number and Name: 
Chapter 3 : section 3.1 warning :

Describe the issue: 

Need to add in samba/ctdb deployment section  of install guide that ctdb package is now part of samba channel and all the updates for ctdb will be provided via the samba channel.

Chapter 3 : section 3.1 warning :


The CTDB version 2.5 is being deprecated from Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.1 Update 2 release. Further updates will not be provided for ctdb2.x. You must upgrade the system to ctdb-4.x, which is provided in a samba channel, for all updates including the security updates.

Suggestions for improvement: 

Additional information:

Comment 3 Michael Adam 2016-01-18 07:15:13 UTC
This is the counterpart of the corresponding BZ for the admin guide.

Comment 5 Michael Adam 2016-01-18 17:10:42 UTC
"...you must upgrade the system to CTDB 4.x, which is provided in a separate channel or repository."

This sounds so mysterious. Can we name the channel as the samba channel?

Comment 7 Michael Adam 2016-01-19 06:47:30 UTC
Looks good to me, thanks!

Comment 8 surabhi 2016-01-25 06:29:38 UTC
The required warning has been added and the doc text looks fine. Moving the BZ to verified.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.