RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 130171 - Add pdsh to distro
Summary: Add pdsh to distro
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: distribution
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: RHEL Program Management
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL: IT_36561
Whiteboard: None
Depends On:
Blocks: 130530
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-08-17 18:19 UTC by Dave Maley
Modified: 2018-10-20 00:52 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-07-13 18:00:46 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Dave Maley 2004-08-17 18:19:10 UTC
$ rpm -qpi pdsh-1.7.6-72.i586.rpm
warning: pdsh-1.7.6-72.i586.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 9c800aca
Name        : pdsh                 Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version     : 1.7.6                Vendor: SuSE Linux AG, Nuernberg, Germany
Release     : 72                   Build Date: Tue 23 Sep 2003 02:40:49 PM PDT
Install Date: (not installed)      Build Host: Shull.suse.de
Group       : Productivity/Clustering/Computing   
Source RPM  : pdsh-1.7.6-72.src.rpm
Size        : 149930                           License: GPL
Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Tue 23 Sep 2003 03:29:36 PM PDT, Key ID a84edae89c800aca
Packager    : http://www.suse.de/feedback
URL         : http://www.llnl.gov/linux/pdsh/
Summary     : Parallel remote shell program
Description :
Pdsh is a multithreaded remote shell client which executes commands on multiple
remote hosts in parallel.  Pdsh can use several different remote shell services,
including standard "rsh", Kerberos IV, and ssh.

Authors:
--------
   Jim Garlick <garlick>

Comment 2 Dave Maley 2004-08-17 18:25:03 UTC
The big advantages of pdsh really kick in when you combine it with genders (bug
130173).  That would give us a substantial advantage over SuSE.

Comment 5 Dave Maley 2004-10-27 16:37:07 UTC
rperkins posted this request in the associated IT ticket:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

>This is a tough one.
>Please fill out the applicable portions the featurezilla template at:
>http://lacrosse.corp.redhat.com/rhs/pm/docs/prodmgmt/process/feature_template_v2.txt

This _is_ FZ for this request.  No need for another.

>Specifically, we need to know what the status is upstream, what kind of target 
>architectures and platforms this would be for, etc.

Upstream is LLNL for this package.  This is not a kernel feature, it is a
user-space tool.  See the URL in the initial request for the upstream homepage.



Comment 14 Benjamin Kahn 2006-09-14 19:10:33 UTC
The cluster-5.0 flag is going away....

Comment 16 Kiersten (Kerri) Anderson 2007-04-23 17:27:00 UTC
Fixing Product Name.  Cluster Suite was integrated into the Enterprise Linux for
version 5.0.

Comment 17 RHEL Program Management 2007-04-25 23:24:36 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 18 Kiersten (Kerri) Anderson 2007-05-03 17:47:30 UTC
Is this still a consideration for 5.1?  Would have to be a package add and need
someone to support it.

Comment 19 Kiersten (Kerri) Anderson 2007-05-03 17:56:54 UTC
Also, since this is adding a package, changing component to distribution and
reassigning it to someone in pm.

Comment 28 Bill Nottingham 2008-10-09 18:47:24 UTC
Honestly, I think for RHEL 6 we'd use something like Func if we were going to go down this road.

Comment 29 Christopher D. Maestas 2008-11-12 03:39:10 UTC
Can we include this in EPEL?  I would like to work on becoming the maintainer.
I'm not discounting func, but the functionality with pdsh very useful for forking parallel commands with ssh, rsh, and general exec.

Comment 30 Bill Nottingham 2008-11-12 16:29:42 UTC
There is nothing that prevents a willing maintainer from maintaining a properly-licensed open-source package in EPEL.

Comment 31 RHEL Program Management 2009-05-19 22:46:22 UTC
Product Management has reviewed and declined this request.  You may appeal this
decision by reopening this request.

Comment 34 Daniel Riek 2009-05-29 17:14:04 UTC
This enhancement request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion a Red Hat Enterprise Linux major release.

Red Hat does not currently plan to provide this enhanced functionality in the next Red Hat Enterprise Linux major release.

Red Hat values your feedback and will take this enhancement request into consideration for future major releases of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.