Bug 1303007 – Arch-specific libreoffice-headless Provide cannot be used as a build-require

Bug 1303007 - Arch-specific libreoffice-headless Provide cannot be used as a build-require

Summary:	Arch-specific libreoffice-headless Provide cannot be used as a build-require

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	libreoffice (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	Unspecified Unspecified

Priority	unspecified Severity unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	David Tardon
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2016-01-29 04:40 EST by Petr Pisar
Modified:	2016-02-22 13:54 EST (History)
CC List:	6 users (show)

See Also:	1303619 1305212
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-02-22 13:54:15 EST
Type:	Bug
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Petr Pisar 2016-01-29 04:40:59 EST

Since commit:

commit 6456d6e5f30c55a43cd923e2fdbb3a6b79a3ca9d
Author: David Tardon <dtardon@redhat.com>
Date:   Sat Dec 26 16:26:28 2015 +0100

    make all deps arch-specific

libreoffice-core provides libreoffice-headless(x86-64) instead of libreoffice-headless. This makes the symbol unusable in build-requires because build-requires are forbidden to be arch-specific (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRequires_and_.25.7B_isa.7D).

This prevents perl-OpenOffice-UNO from building <http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12722131>.

We could change the build-require to libreoffice-core that is arch-independent, but I'd like to know your opinion. Is libreoffice-headless symbol deprecrated, or will you remove the %{?_isa} from the Provide?

Comment 1 David Tardon 2016-02-11 03:43:00 EST

We should provide both plain and %{?_isa} version, to match rpmbuild-generated Provides.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.