Hide Forgot
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/pki/ticket/1634 From review point with ftweedal on original Features feature: > I think that we should store the config in LDAP so that a change on > one replica is effected on clones. Obviously this is a fair bit > more work I am OK with using CS.cfg initially but we should have > this discussion. > Agreed that this is something we should discuss. Part of the reason this is system specific though is that people tend to update one system at a time -- in case something goes wrong. So you can very easily see a situation where a feature is available on one system but not another. Still, having it in LDAP would allow doing things like enabling features topology-wide for instance.
Per CS Bug/Ticket Triage held 04/19/2016: RHEL 7.4 Confirmed with alee and ftweedal: I think 10.4/RHEL 7.4 is OK; AFAIK we won't have any features likely to be dynamically enabled or disabled during deployment lifecycle.
Per RHEL 7.5.z/7.6/8.0 Triage: edewata: close RHEL bug, keep upstream ticket in FUTURE