Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:

There is no validation of rpm packages added to filter rules via hammer

This can be demonstrated using an rpm include filter for a content view

The package name being passed in is not validated. So you can add "rpms"
called "this_does_not_exist"


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

6.1.6

How reproducible:

100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create an rpm include content view filter.
2. Add a non existing package

# hammer --username=admin --password=<password> content-view filter rule create --organization=org-example --content-view='filter test' --content-view-filter='test_filter' --name does_not_exist

Will add packge name "does_not_exist" to the included rpms


Actual results:

See above

Expected results:

There should be some validation that the requested package exists


Additional info:

Moving 6.2 bugs out to sat-backlog.

Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you.