Hide Forgot
Description of problem: I'm unable to set static network details for an interface by passing parameters when booted to install DVD. I"m using parameters from 20.1. Configuring the Installation System at the Boot Menu <https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html-single/Installation_Guide/index.html#sect-boot-options-installer>. How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Boot RHEL7.2 installation DVD [1] 2. Select [I]nstall 3. Press <TAB> to edit 4. Append a valid network configuration [2] 5. Proceed with boot to install [1]: SHA-256: 03f3a0291634335f6995534d829bd21ffaa0d000004dfeb1b2fb81052d64a4d5 RHEL-7.2-20151030.0-Server-x86_64-dvd1.iso downloaded from access.redhat.com [2]: Example, ip=192.168.10.15::192.168.10.254:host15:em1:none Actual results: dracut: FATAL: For argument 'ip=192.168.10.15::192.168.10.254:host15:em1:none'\nSorry, setting client-ip does not make sense for 'dhcp' dracut: Refusing to continue Expected results: Static network configuration applied to interface; installation proceeds. Additional info: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836039 The only way I was able to get connected to the network to perform a non-interactive kickstart network install was to put a dhcp server on the network. ip=em1:dhcp worked; the system pulled its kickstart and proceeded to perform an installation completely without interaction.
Turns out it's user error. Apparently, I've been reading the docs/parameter wrong this whole time even as meticulous as I've attempted to be. I was sure I was getting everything correct and it was failing me as a bug. Please let me know how I should proceed to close this properly. Should I just set Status: CLOSED?
Closing the bug per comment 2.
Comment 2 is not viewable. The rest of bug #1307148 is viewable. Can there be something on Comment #2 that can be made public? Thanks.
(In reply to Don Krajewski from comment #4) > Comment 2 is not viewable. The rest of bug #1307148 is viewable. Can there > be something on Comment #2 that can be made public? Thanks. Don, I believe it's now public. I didn't realize when I posted the comment in-reply to my submission that it defaulted to private.
Thank you. Don