Hide Forgot
Latest upstream release: 0.94 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.92-347.fc24 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/IPC-Cmd/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.
Created attachment 1123692 [details] [patch] Update to 0.94 (#1307195)
Scratch build completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12959183
pghmcfc's perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=735571
Build done: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12967501
A bug fix release suitable for all Fedoras.
Any reason why to run-require IPC::Run? IPC::Cmd uses IPC::Open3 on non-Windows instead. See the BEGIN section in IPC::Cmd: $USE_IPC_RUN = IS_WIN32 && !IS_WIN98; $USE_IPC_OPEN3 = not IS_VMS;
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #6) > Any reason why to run-require IPC::Run? IPC::Cmd uses IPC::Open3 on > non-Windows instead. See the BEGIN section in IPC::Cmd: > > $USE_IPC_RUN = IS_WIN32 && !IS_WIN98; > $USE_IPC_OPEN3 = not IS_VMS; If someone sets the variable $IPC::Cmd::USE_IPC_RUN then IPC::Run is preferred, as per the documentation "HOW IT WORKS". Clearly it's not the default though, so I can see the argument for not including it, or perhaps relegating it to a "Suggests:". I don't think it's a big dependency anyway though, probably only pulling in IO::Tty as an extra dependency.
The documentation states: > If you have C<IPC::Run> installed, and the variable C<$IPC::Cmd::USE_IPC_RUN> Therefore I'm keen to make the dependency weak. Would you use rather Recommends: or Suggests? I want to do it this way and push the upgrade also into older Fedoras.
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #8) > The documentation states: > > > If you have C<IPC::Run> installed, and the variable C<$IPC::Cmd::USE_IPC_RUN> > > Therefore I'm keen to make the dependency weak. Would you use rather > Recommends: or Suggests? > > I want to do it this way and push the upgrade also into older Fedoras. I think Suggests: would be fine.
perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7b802c1f55
perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8fb5a18a11
perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8fb5a18a11
perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7b802c1f55
perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
ppisar's perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94-3.fc25 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=755529
jplesnik's perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94-4.fc25 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=762679