Bug 1309153 - Does python3-funcsigs make any sense?
Summary: Does python3-funcsigs make any sense?
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-funcsigs
Version: 24
Hardware: All
OS: All
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Haïkel Guémar
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-02-17 01:53 UTC by Adam Williamson
Modified: 2016-06-11 14:39 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-06-11 14:39:27 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Adam Williamson 2016-02-17 01:53:06 UTC
I may be missing something, but why does python3-funcsigs exist at all for Fedora?

funcsigs is described thus:

"funcsigs is a backport of the PEP 362 function signature features from Python 3.3’s inspect module."

All supported Fedora releases have at least Python 3.3, so what is the point of building python3-funcsigs? Surely only python2-funcsigs should be produced?

Comment 1 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 15:39:51 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase

Comment 2 hguemar 2016-06-11 14:39:27 UTC
@Adam: sorry for the late notice, the only point for python3 package is for python2/3 portability reasons. The new signature API is available under the funcsigs module, and not inspect in python2. So it serves to avoid try/catch ImportError logic to import the module.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.