This service will be undergoing maintenance at 00:00 UTC, 2016-08-01. It is expected to last about 1 hours
Bug 130919 - bind-devel-10:9.2.4rc7-8 specifies subpackage interdependencies incorrectly
bind-devel-10:9.2.4rc7-8 specifies subpackage interdependencies incorrectly
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: bind (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jason Vas Dias
Ben Levenson
:
: 130920 130940 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2004-08-25 15:20 EDT by Nalin Dahyabhai
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-08-25 16:08:57 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Nalin Dahyabhai 2004-08-25 15:20:41 EDT
bind-devel-10:9.2.4rc7-8 requires "bind =
%{epoch}:%{name}-%{version}-%{release}".  RPM version strings don't
include the package name, so this requirement won't be satisfied.

The requirement needs to be stated as either "bind =
%{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}", "bind = %{version}-%{release}", or
"bind = %{version}", though in this case I'd recommend "bind =
%{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}".
Comment 1 Kaj J. Niemi 2004-08-25 15:26:36 EDT
*** Bug 130920 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Kaj J. Niemi 2004-08-25 15:27:40 EDT
Also.. why is the epoch now 10 when rc7 didn't have an epoch at all?
Comment 3 Jason Vas Dias 2004-08-25 16:08:57 EDT
This is now fixed in bind-9.2.4rc7-9 .
Comment 4 Jason Vas Dias 2004-08-25 17:59:55 EDT
*** Bug 130940 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 John Flanagan 2004-12-21 14:49:56 EST
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2004-567.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.