Hide Forgot
Created attachment 1129181 [details] Add Supplements for langpacks namimg guidelines Description of problem: As per newly approved https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Langpack guidelines in https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/593#comment:18 , I would like to request to please commit the attached patch so that langpacks installation will be helpful.
I didn't realize Rich dependencies were sanctioned yet, I assume this is a f24+ only change? Any objection to my conditionally wrapping things like: %if 0%{?fedora} > 23 Supplements: (%{name} = %{version}-%{release} and langpacks-ar) %endif ??
speaking with tibbs, we're pretty sure it should be safe for f23+ at least, and we're not going to be backporting this version of f22 (most likely), so should be safe as-is
Rex, Thanks for your help in committing required changes.
Looking at this closer, I wonder why you want rich-deps here at all, why is this simpler: Supplements: langpacks-foo not sufficient?
Ah, nevermind, we don't want this pulled in unconditionally, that's why. That said, I think we could consider making the conditional on something better than kde-l10n... I'll think more on it.
Thank you for understanding the use here for langpacks functionality. Like calligra-l10n, if needed conditionals can be added here as well.