Hide Forgot
Description of problem: SELinux problem ocurred after connecting Vodafone (Huawei) K5150 LTE USB modem lsusb: Bus 001 Device 005: ID 12d1:1f16 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. K5150 LTE modem (Mass Storage Mode) dmesg: [ 955.200079] scsi 6:0:0:0: Direct-Access Vodafone Storage(Huawei) 2.31 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 [ 955.202834] sd 6:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 0 [ 955.277522] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI removable disk SELinux is preventing dhclient from 'name_bind' accesses on the udp_socket port 61000. ***** Plugin catchall_boolean (89.3 confidence) suggests ****************** If you want to allow nis to enabled Then you must tell SELinux about this by enabling the 'nis_enabled' boolean. You can read 'None' man page for more details. Do setsebool -P nis_enabled 1 ***** Plugin catchall (11.6 confidence) suggests ************************** If you believe that dhclient should be allowed name_bind access on the port 61000 udp_socket by default. Then you should report this as a bug. You can generate a local policy module to allow this access. Do allow this access for now by executing: # grep dhclient /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M mypol # semodule -i mypol.pp Additional Information: Source Context system_u:system_r:dhcpc_t:s0 Target Context system_u:object_r:ephemeral_port_t:s0 Target Objects port 61000 [ udp_socket ] Source dhclient Source Path dhclient Port 61000 Host (removed) Source RPM Packages Target RPM Packages Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.13.1-155.fc23.noarch Selinux Enabled True Policy Type targeted Enforcing Mode Enforcing Host Name (removed) Platform Linux (removed) 4.2.6-301.fc23.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Nov 20 22:22:41 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 Alert Count 1 First Seen 2015-12-07 16:04:01 CET Last Seen 2015-12-07 16:04:01 CET Local ID 19a7a8b6-90e4-4ded-8515-f69826799e33 Raw Audit Messages type=AVC msg=audit(1449500641.622:733): avc: denied { name_bind } for pid=10755 comm="dhclient" src=61000 scontext=system_u:system_r:dhcpc_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:ephemeral_port_t:s0 tclass=udp_socket permissive=0 Hash: dhclient,dhcpc_t,ephemeral_port_t,udp_socket,name_bind Version-Release number of selected component: selinux-policy-3.13.1-155.fc23.noarch Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.6.4 hashmarkername: setroubleshoot kernel: 4.4.2-301.fc23.x86_64 type: libreport Potential duplicate: bug 1049644
f24 allows dhcpc_t access to ephermal_port_t: $> sesearch -A -s dhcpc_t -c udp_socket -p name_bind Found 5 semantic av rules: allow dhcpc_t dhcpc_port_t : udp_socket name_bind ; allow dhcpc_t unreserved_port_type : udp_socket name_bind ; allow nsswitch_domain ephemeral_port_t : udp_socket name_bind ; allow nsswitch_domain unreserved_port_t : udp_socket name_bind ; allow nsswitch_domain port_t : udp_socket name_bind ; also RHEL7 allows this access. seems this is fixed.
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '23'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 23 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-12-20. Fedora 23 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.