Bug 1317664 - [Director][Documentation] Need documentation of predictable placement
Summary: [Director][Documentation] Need documentation of predictable placement
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: documentation
Version: 8.0 (Liberty)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: ga
: 8.0 (Liberty)
Assignee: Dan Macpherson
QA Contact: RHOS Documentation Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-03-14 19:37 UTC by Ben Nemec
Modified: 2017-09-11 17:13 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-06-16 04:41:26 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
OpenStack gerrit 274217 0 None None None 2016-03-14 19:37:57 UTC

Description Ben Nemec 2016-03-14 19:37:58 UTC 
Description of problem: A new feature is being added in OSPd 8 that will allow users to specify exactly which baremetal node is used for each overcloud instance.  It will require new documentation, which has been started upstream: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274217/
Comment 3 Dan Macpherson 2016-05-03 03:29:24 UTC 
Hi Ben,

I've published this content as part of the OSP8 GA release:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-openstack-platform/8/director-installation-and-usage/63-controlling-node-placement

Were there any further changes required to this section?
Comment 4 Ben Nemec 2016-05-13 19:33:32 UTC 
Looks good to me, thanks!
Comment 5 Cyril Lopez 2016-05-16 11:32:04 UTC 
(In reply to Ben Nemec from comment #4)
> Looks good to me, thanks!

+1
Comment 6 Dan Macpherson 2016-06-16 04:41:26 UTC 
Changes now live on the customer portal.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.