Bug 1317824 - Publishing content views ends with timeout error
Summary: Publishing content views ends with timeout error
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Content Views
Version: 6.1.7
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
high
high vote
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: satellite6-bugs
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-03-15 10:16 UTC by Roman Bobek
Modified: 2019-11-14 07:36 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-01-05 14:28:29 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Roman Bobek 2016-03-15 10:16:18 UTC
Description of problem:
Publishing more than one content view is consuming servers IO (mongodb process consumes 50 - 200 MB/s). Content views are relatively small - contains 2 - 4 repositories. DB is located on SAN storage.

Publishing takes a long time and ends wit timeout error.

Satellite is running on vm with 16 CPUs and 16 GB RAM.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Issue reproduced by Chris Roberts:

"I am seeing the same issue with iscsi storage with 2 content views publishing with 2 rhel 7 repos:

34369 mongodb   20   0 12.585g 900368 774608 S 122.2  5.5 226:20.70 mongod
37837 apache    20   0 1126532 464796   4764 S  27.8  2.9 234:28.87 celery
30432 root      20   0  157944   2448   1500 R  16.7  0.0   0:00.05 top
37802 apache    20   0 1126968 255972   3800 S  16.7  1.6  16:42.71 celery
37842 apache    20   0 1125776 250672   4740 S  16.7  1.5  15:00.31 celery
"
It seems that external storage is the issue here.

Actual results:
Publishing more content views takes a long time and ends with timeout.

Expected results:
Acceptable publishing time and no timeout.

Comment 8 Michael Hrivnak 2016-12-05 20:20:10 UTC
I think the component of this should probably not be "Pulp", since the fix was for katello to change how and when it queries pulp. Brad, if you agree, can you perhaps find a better component for it?

Comment 9 Michael Hrivnak 2016-12-12 21:43:17 UTC
I'm changing the component since this does not appear to be a bug in Pulp.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.