Bug 1319082 - http-binding performance drop with SWITCHYARD-2047
Summary: http-binding performance drop with SWITCHYARD-2047
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Fuse Service Works 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: SwitchYard
Version: 6.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Pavel Macik
QA Contact: Pavel Macik
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-03-18 15:41 UTC by ppecka
Modified: 2016-03-18 15:54 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)
reproducer (44.26 KB, application/zip)
2016-03-18 15:41 UTC, ppecka
no flags Details
jprofiler data (16.16 KB, application/zip)
2016-03-18 15:42 UTC, ppecka
no flags Details

Description ppecka 2016-03-18 15:41:16 UTC
Created attachment 1137812 [details]
reproducer

Description of problem:
Performance tests with Rollup patch FSW_6.0_2_2015 shows 60% performance drop on http-binding. The issue was most likely introduced with PR SWITCHYARD-2047.


Actual results:
60% performance drop compared to 600GA


Expected results:
insignificant performance drop or better then GA


Additional info:
for more info ask pmacik

Comment 1 ppecka 2016-03-18 15:42:55 UTC
Created attachment 1137813 [details]
jprofiler data

Comment 2 tcunning 2016-03-18 15:44:28 UTC
Copying from email thread : 


https://github.com/jboss-switchyard/core/pull/616 (the most likely suspect, as it introduces org.switchyard.security.jboss.credential.extractor.JBossServletRequestCredentialExtractor).   This is a new class in p12, and represents functionality that was requested by LBank (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247347).     

The specific issue here is : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-2047

The other less likely option is : 

https://github.com/jboss-switchyard/switchyard/pull/10/files : Not sure if there is a large X509 Certificate attached to these requests, if there is, this might be the culprit.

Do these scenarios have a lot of role-based data associated with them?     Do we see these regressions if SSO isn't set up?   Is there a X509 Certificate associated with the request that's being copied?


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.