Hide Forgot
---> Package libreoffice-core.i686 1:5.1.2.1-1.fc25 will be installed Checking deps for libreoffice-core.i686 1:5.1.2.1-1.fc25 - u looking for ('libreoffice-data', 'EQ', ('1', '5.1.2.1', '1.fc25')) as a requirement of libreoffice-core.i686 1:5.1.2.1-1.fc25 - u looking for ('libreoffice-opensymbol-fonts', 'EQ', ('1', '5.1.2.1', '1.fc25')) as a requirement of libreoffice-core.i686 1:5.1.2.1-1.fc25 - u looking for ('libreoffice-ure(x86-32)', 'EQ', ('1', '5.1.2.1', '1.fc25')) as a requirement of libreoffice-core.i686 1:5.1.2.1-1.fc25 - u looking for ('java-headless', 'GE', ('1', '1.6', None)) as a requirement of libreoffice-core.i686 1:5.1.2.1-1.fc25 - u looking for ('(libreoffice-plugin(x86-32) or libreoffice-gtk2(x86-32))', None, (None, None, None)) as a requirement of libreoffice-core.i686 1:5.1.2.1-1.fc25 - u Error: Invalid version flag: or ---------------------------------- - dependency or repository issue - ---------------------------------- A detailed explaination and dialoge can be found in the bugreport below: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317481 Sadly using rich dependency will break 3rd party package manegement as well as yum (which is still commonly used - as long as dnf won't catch up with missing stuff).
I just opened a report for glibc in advance. Wrote a few more lines about the woes we have with rich dependency. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319461
All right, the 'or' part is intended just as a safety net to select a default plugin, so it is not really needed.