Bug 1320851 - RFE: HTTP/2 for the default router
Summary: RFE: HTTP/2 for the default router
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: RFE
Version: 3.1.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 3.11.0
Assignee: Ben Bennett
QA Contact: Johnny Liu
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1425431 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-03-24 07:58 UTC by Christophe Augello
Modified: 2021-12-10 14:37 UTC (History)
19 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-10-04 15:54:19 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 2274201 0 None None None 2017-11-18 21:53:58 UTC

Description Christophe Augello 2016-03-24 07:58:19 UTC
> 3. What is the nature and description of the request?

State of the art request handling.
HTTP/2 is more and more coming for modern web application.
OpenShift should be able to handle this native.

https://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/http2-configuring-haproxy.html

> 4. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

Push message to the browser web application.

> 5. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)

A example solution look like this
https://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/http2-configuring-haproxy.html

> 6. For each functional requirement listed in question 5, specify how Red Hat
> and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.

You can use this tool to check if the setup work.
https://tools.keycdn.com/http2-test

> 7. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat bugzilla?
N/A

> 8. Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies?

Openshift v 3.x

> 9. Is the sales team involved in this request and do they have any additional input?
  No

> 10. List any affected packages or components.
openshift3/ose-haproxy-router

> 11. Would the customer be able to assis
Yes.

Comment 3 Mangirdas 2016-08-22 14:26:00 UTC
If you need more details, just ask here. We will try provide as much as we can here

Comment 6 Dan McPherson 2017-02-21 16:27:47 UTC
*** Bug 1425431 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 19 Ben Bennett 2018-10-04 15:54:19 UTC
This is in 3.11.

So the router can accept http/2 connections, but can not use http/2 to the backend because haproxy does not yet have that capability.

https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/19968


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.