Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1322699 - [Docs][Admin][RFE] Note that tagged and untagged VLAN networks can be used together on interfaces and bonds
[Docs][Admin][RFE] Note that tagged and untagged VLAN networks can be used to...
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation (Show other bugs)
3.6.0
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity unspecified
: ovirt-3.6.7
: ---
Assigned To: Byron Gravenorst
Tahlia Richardson
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-03-31 03:18 EDT by Lucy Bopf
Modified: 2016-07-03 19:37 EDT (History)
9 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-07-03 19:37:10 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: Docs
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Lucy Bopf 2016-03-31 03:18:22 EDT
From RHEV 3.6, tagged and untagged VLAN networks can be used together on interfaces and bonds. There are a few sections in the Admin Guide that state that this is not possible. These sections should be updated.


Note: More detailed information on configuring interfaces and bonds has been requested, and will be covered in bug 980360.
Comment 1 Lucy Bopf 2016-05-03 02:22:58 EDT
Assigning to Byron for review.
Comment 4 Marina 2016-05-17 17:12:06 EDT
I think we need to ask someone who understands linux networking better. 
Based on bug title, that line is incorrect. But I am not really sure what is actually correct.

Dan, maybe you can clarify?
Comment 5 Yaniv Lavi 2016-06-21 07:31:13 EDT
Can you reply on the question above?
Comment 6 Alona Kaplan 2016-06-21 08:12:53 EDT
(In reply to Marina from comment #4)
> I think we need to ask someone who understands linux networking better. 
> Based on bug title, that line is incorrect. But I am not really sure what is
> actually correct.
> 
> Dan, maybe you can clarify?

The line is still correct since when creating a bond we still need to check whether the logical networks are compatible. For example, two non-vlan networks still cannot be assigned to the same bond/interface.

This RFE is talking about removing the restriction of having non-vlan vm network attached to the same nic with vlan networks.

Now, after the fix, one non-vlan (vm or non-vm) network can reside on the same nic with multiple vlan networks (previously is was allowed only for non-vlan non-vm network).

More details can be found in - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1227865

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.