Hide Forgot
Description of problem: Satellite 6 allows provisioning using IPMI / PXE. Our customer currently relies on the native ILO protocol (https based) to boot an ISO image, IPMI is blocked in the network based on security concerns. ILO by itself allows XML based requests over https, HP offers “HP ILO Scripting Tools”: http://www8.hp.com/us/en/products/server-software/product-detail.html?oid=5219389 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Satellite 6.1.x How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Power control HP server with IPMI off 2. 3. Actual results: No functionality Expected results: Working power control Additional info:
Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/15438 from this bug
Upstream bug component is Provisioning
Upstream bug component is Capsule
Upstream bug component is Uncategorized
Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you.
Any possibility of this being re-consider for the later version or upcoming? https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/collections/community/general/hpilo_boot_module.html
Upon review of our valid but aging backlog the Satellite Team has concluded that this Bugzilla does not meet the criteria for a resolution in the near term, and are planning to close in a month. This message may be a repeat of a previous update and the bug is again being considered to be closed. If you have any concerns about this, please contact your Red Hat Account team. Thank you.
(In reply to Brad Buckingham from comment #12) > Upon review of our valid but aging backlog the Satellite Team has concluded > that this Bugzilla does not meet the criteria for a resolution in the near > term, and are planning to close in a month. This message may be a repeat of > a previous update and the bug is again being considered to be closed. If you > have any concerns about this, please contact your Red Hat Account team. > Thank you. Hi, this seems like a standard reply, did you also review the linked RFE from 4 days ago?
Hello Jürgen, Thank you for reaching out. Comment 12 is part of an automated process to maintain the backlog. Given that comment 11 was recently added and resulted in the bugzilla being re-opened after a closure (in 2018), I'll flag the bugzilla so that it goes back through RFE triage review.