Bug 1323984 - Examples requires higher version of hamcrest
Summary: Examples requires higher version of hamcrest
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: hamcrest
Version: 6.8
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Java maintainers
QA Contact: BaseOS QE - Apps
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-04-05 09:22 UTC by Branislav Náter
Modified: 2016-07-22 06:15 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-07-22 06:15:47 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Branislav Náter 2016-04-05 09:22:57 UTC
Description of problem:
During testing hamcrest, I wanted to try examples from hamcrest-demo subpackage. It seems that all three examples for junit3 requires classes that are not present in hamcrest 1.1. Namely org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert EasyMock2Matchers and JMock1Matchers

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
hamcrest-1.1-9.5.el6
hamcrest-demo-1.1-9.5.el6

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. try to compile example:
javac -cp /usr/share/java/hamcrest/all.jar:/usr/share/java/junit.jar /usr/share/hamcrest-1.1/hamcrest-examples/src/main/java/org/hamcrest/examples/junit3/ExampleWithAssertThat.java

Actual results:
ExampleWithAssertThat.java:4: error: cannot find symbol
import static org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.*;
                          ^
  symbol:   class MatcherAssert
  location: package org.hamcrest

Expected results:
Success

Additional info:
Classes are present in hamcrest 1.3 http://hamcrest.org/JavaHamcrest/javadoc/1.3/

Comment 2 Mikolaj Izdebski 2016-07-22 05:39:51 UTC
Red Hat Enterprise Linux version 6 is entering the Production 2 phase of its lifetime and this bug doesn't meet the criteria for it, i.e. only high severity issues will be fixed. Please see https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/ for further information.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2016-07-22 06:15:47 UTC
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request.
You may appeal this decision by reopening this request.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.